Signification and pain: a semiotic reading of fibromyalgia.

Patients with persistent pain who lack a detectable underlying disease challenge the theories supporting much of biomedical body-mind discourse. In this context, diagnostic labeling is as inherently vulnerable to the same pitfalls of uncertainty that beset any other interpretative endeavour. The end point is often no more than a name rather than the discovered essence of a pre-existent medical condition. In 1990 a Committee of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) formulated the construct of Fibromyalgia in an attempt to rectify a situation of diagnostic confusion faced by patients presenting with widespread pain. It was proposed that Fibromyalgia existed as a "specific entity", separable from but curiously able to co-exist with any other painful condition. Epistemological and semiotic analyses of Fibromyalgia have failed to find any sign, clinical or linguistic, which could differentiate it from other diffuse musculoskeletal pain states. The construct of Fibromyalgia sought to define a discernable reality outside the play of language and to pass it off as a natural phenomenon. However, because it has failed both clinically and semiotically, the construct also fails the test of medical utility for the subject in persistent pain.